Autodesk revit structure 2016 for teacher best price autodesk autocad design suite 5 student price graphisoft archicad 13
Dfmpro 3.7 price discount buy now lynda lynda gibbscam 2014 rar password product buy discount Corel
buy oem 707 buy oem buy oem Futuremark 3dmark 06 advanced discount
microsoft project 2013 server dashboard Suite Ultimate 2015 cheap version 6 cheap price Buy now best price autodesk robot structural analysis professional 2014 6 cheap price

service Pro 2016 Pro 2016 smith Eye Paid by credit card chief architect premier x7 buy fast smith, autodesk service smith Resolume avenue 3 discount price

Category: ethics

Sam Harris at TED

Sam Harris’ Moral Assumptions

frame maker 10 training frame maker 10 training cheap price buy discount Corel & student 2013 review Windows server 2008 r2 standard discount
Apple motion 5 buy online Windows 7 Professional buy oem buy oem X4
A few weeks ago I made some posts discussing the role science can play in describing our moral values and their origins. I took pains at every point of the way though to point out that I was not prescribing any moral behavior, or defending our evolved morality as “right”. This is not to say…


Science and Morality Wrapup

In this last post in this series on morality I want to try to tie together some of the seemingly disparate paths we’ve traveled down these past two weeks. I began with an argument for the need to consider scientific knowledge when thinking about morality and moral standards, and further made the argument that any…

Theory of Mind and Moral Judgments

In interacting with other human beings we presuppose that people have their own thoughts and beliefs and desires and that these states can be judged objectively on the basis of this knowledge of them being separate and distinct beings from us. This understanding of the intentional states of others is called Theory of Mind. What are the mechanisms that underlie Theory of Mind, and how important are they in judgments regarding the actions of others?

split brain fallacy

Emotions and Rationality

Up until now I’ve been making a case for the distinct causal roles our emotional and more rational brain systems play in moral judgments. This is a false distinction. The fact remains that the individual making a moral judgment is an organism susceptible to emotions, and whether those emotions can be fully divorced from rational thought is an area worth exploring.


The Neuroscience of Philosophical Hypotheticals

Anyone who has even a basic familiarity with philosophy, or has stayed up late arguing with friends after a few drinks, has probably at one time or another been posed with some sort of hypothetical situation. Hypotheticals are both difficult to answer and interesting to contemplate precisely because we are posed with a situation we have never been in, and might never be in.


Moral Intuitions vs. Moral Standards

When we talk about morality we too often neglect to consider the relationship our moral decisions have with innate moral intuitions. While moral standards could be described as prescriptive statements regarding human behavior (how should I act?), moral intuitions could be better described as descriptive statements regarding the cause of that behavior (why did I act this way?).