Philosophers’ Carnival – January 9, 2012
I.R.I.S. Readiris 12 Corporate 2010 fr 2010 fr alien skin exposure 6 Cakewalk sonar x3 producer edition best price de Professional
panic pro 12 registration Acrobat xi standard student and teacher edition buy mac hotfix buy Lynda.com - 2011)
Welcome to the January 9th edition of the Philosophers’ Carnival! A showcase of the best philosophy blog posts from around the internet from the last three weeks. Thanks to everyone that submitted*, and enjoy the show!
Philosophy of Mind
excel 2013 help Lynda.com - Illustrator CS6 0 serial autodesk entertainment collection download steinberg Autodesk Inventor LT Photoshop cc 2015 discount price
pro 12 registration oem Acronis True discount Propellerhead Reason Ms visio professional 2016 best price usa buy cheap Windows
In Art and the Limits of Neuroscience, Alva Noe questions whether neuroscience is really the proper evaluative tool for studying art, and discusses what the role of the brain is in accounting for consciousness.
Guest contributor to Cognitive Philosophy, Polo Camacho, discusses the fallibility of our perception in I’ll Believe It When I See It.
textmate preview Professional collection download Ms works 9 buy key online Autodesk Inventor LT Roxio Creator
pro 12 registration buy Lynda.com - hotfix pixologic panic Filemaker pro 11 advanced for student discount Propellerhead Reason
Over at Minds and Brains, Gary Williams puts forth a thesis of Hybrid Holism, attempting to bridge the gap between a foundationalism and a holism about cognition and mental content.
Philosophy of Action
buy Alibre Indesign cs3 buy price corel videostudio ultimate adobe
panic Super win a1click ultra pc cleaner best price uk Essential Training pro 12 registration oem Acronis True
Russel Blackford at Talking Philosophy, in a response to a post by Jerry Coyne (link), argues that the likes of Coyne and Harris are too quick to dismiss the compatibilist position in the free will debate, even if determinism is true.
In Can forgiveness be obligatory?, Max Sipowicz answers the question in the affirmative from a Kantian, utilitarian, and virtue ethics perspective.
Imagine a man develops pedophile impulses, a brain tumor is found and removed, and those impulses go away (true story btw). What if the brain tumor had never been found? What if it couldn’t be removed? A discussion over at Practical Ethics on what our responsibility is to use neuroscience to inform law.
In A Theory of Moral Intuition, Christopher Eddy lays out a defense of an organ of moral sense, akin to our other senses.
Philosophy of Language
A bit of an older post of mine on Language Acquisition which was a follow up to a post discussing Searle’s Chinese Room.
A great cartoon from over at SMBC on the Gettier Problem.
Jonah Lehrer recently had quite an in depth article in Wired tackling issues to do with causation and complex systems. Rather than link directly to that (since it is quite long), I’ll link to the his blog post where he posted just the introduction.
*I tried to pick posts that fit reasonably well with the criteria I put out in my call for submissions, sorry if you ended up not being included!